Whole food · Lamb, Veal, and Game Products
Photo: Wikipedia
This is a premium cut of raw Australian veal from the rib section, featuring a beautiful balance of tender lean meat and a thin, flavorful fat cap. When cooked, it offers a delicate, mild flavor with a fine, velvety texture that is less gamey than beef. Nutritionally, it's a high-protein, low-carb option that provides a substantial source of energy primarily from protein and fat.
Calorie split: 39% protein · 2% carbs · 59% fat
↓ Full nutritionPeople love it for its refined, subtle flavor that acts as a perfect canvas for marinades and sauces, and for its impressive presentation as a celebratory roast. Its versatility allows it to be prepared simply to highlight its natural tenderness or used in elegant, slow-cooked dishes.
The fat content, while flavorful, can be a concern for those monitoring saturated fat intake. As a red meat, it should be consumed in moderation as part of a balanced diet. To counteract this, practice portion control, trim excess external fat before cooking, and pair it with fiber-rich vegetables like roasted asparagus or a crisp salad to balance the meal.
Veal is often considered a 'transitional' meat in culinary history, prized in classical French and Italian cuisines for its delicate flavor that bridges the gap between poultry and the robust taste of mature beef.
| Water | 65.3 g |
| Energy | 201 kcal |
| Energy | 841 kj |
| Protein | 19.6 g |
| Total lipid (fat) | 13.1 g |
| Ash | 0.92 g |
| Carbohydrate, by difference | 1.1 g |
| Fiber, total dietary | 0.00 g |
| Total Sugars | 0.00 g |
| Sucrose | 0.00 g |
| Glucose | 0.00 g |
| Fructose | 0.00 g |
| Lactose | 0.00 g |
| Maltose | 0.00 g |
| Galactose | 0.00 g |
| Calcium, Ca | 9.0 mg |
| Iron, Fe | 1.5 mg |
| Sodium, Na | 76.0 mg |
| Vitamin C, total ascorbic acid | 0.00 mg |
| Vitamin A, RAE | 8.0 ug |
| Retinol | 8.0 ug |
| Carotene, beta | 0.00 ug |
| Carotene, alpha | 0.00 ug |
| Cryptoxanthin, beta | 0.00 ug |
| Vitamin A, IU | 25.0 iu |
| Lycopene | 0.00 ug |
| Lutein + zeaxanthin | 0.00 ug |
| Alcohol, ethyl | 0.00 g |
| Caffeine | 0.00 mg |
| Theobromine | 0.00 mg |
| Fatty acids, total saturated | 5.9 g |
| SFA 4:0 | 0.00 g |
| SFA 6:0 | 0.00 g |
| SFA 10:0 | 0.01 g |
| SFA 12:0 | 0.02 g |
| SFA 14:0 | 0.52 g |
| SFA 15:0 | 0.09 g |
| SFA 16:0 | 3.1 g |
| SFA 17:0 | 0.15 g |
| SFA 18:0 | 2.0 g |
| SFA 20:0 | 0.02 g |
| SFA 22:0 | 0.01 g |
| SFA 24:0 | 0.00 g |
| Fatty acids, total monounsaturated | 5.2 g |
| MUFA 14:1 | 0.13 g |
| MUFA 16:1 | 0.37 g |
| MUFA 18:1 | 4.7 g |
| MUFA 18:1-11 t (18:1t n-7) | 0.35 g |
| MUFA 20:1 | 0.01 g |
| Fatty acids, total polyunsaturated | 0.59 g |
| PUFA 18:2 | 0.30 g |
| PUFA 18:3 | 0.09 g |
| PUFA 18:4 | 0.01 g |
| PUFA 20:2 n-6 c,c | 0.00 g |
| PUFA 20:3 | 0.00 g |
| PUFA 20:4 | 0.15 g |
| PUFA 20:5 n-3 (EPA) | 0.01 g |
| PUFA 22:5 n-3 (DPA) | 0.03 g |
| Fatty acids, total trans | 0.77 g |
| Cholesterol | 60.0 mg |
| Tryptophan | 0.18 g |
| Threonine | 0.78 g |
| Isoleucine | 0.88 g |
| Leucine | 1.4 g |
| Lysine | 1.5 g |
| Methionine | 0.42 g |
| Cystine | 0.20 g |
| Phenylalanine | 0.72 g |
| Tyrosine | 0.57 g |
| Valine | 0.99 g |
| Arginine | 1.0 g |
| Histidine | 0.65 g |
| Alanine | 1.1 g |
| Aspartic acid | 1.5 g |
| Glutamic acid | 2.8 g |
| Glycine | 0.92 g |
| Proline | 0.74 g |
| Serine | 0.67 g |
| Hydroxyproline | 0.10 g |
How does veal taste different from beef?
Veal has a much milder, more delicate flavor and a finer, more tender texture than beef. It is less 'meaty' and gamey, with a subtle sweetness.
What's the best way to cook this cut to keep it tender?
For a rib roast, slow roasting at a moderate temperature is ideal. Searing it first creates a flavorful crust, then finishing it in the oven ensures even cooking. Always let it rest after cooking to retain juices.
Is veal a healthy choice?
Yes, it's a nutritious protein source, rich in iron and B vitamins. Its fat content is generally lower than many beef cuts. As with any red meat, enjoy it in moderation within a varied diet.
NRF9.3 index — Fulgoni, Keast & Drewnowski, 2009. Computed from USDA nutrients.
Composite of energy density (Rolls et al., 1999), protein & fiber satiety, minus sugar. A calculated heuristic — ranks satiety-per-calorie, not a clinical measure.