🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta has more protein (16.2 vs 8.9 g); Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta has less calories (204 vs 260 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has more fiber (1 vs 0.9 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour porkRestaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta
Calories260 kcal204 kcal
Protein8.9 g16.2 g
Carbs25.5 g10.9 g
Fat13.6 g10.6 g
Fiber1 g0.9 g
Sugar0 g2.8 g
Nutrient density13 /10020 /100
Weight-loss score36 /10050 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork · Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork, Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →