🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers has more protein (18.7 vs 8.9 g); Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has less calories (260 vs 307 kcal); Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers has more fiber (1.1 vs 1 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour porkRestaurant, family style, chicken fingers
Calories260 kcal307 kcal
Protein8.9 g18.7 g
Carbs25.5 g18.8 g
Fat13.6 g17.5 g
Fiber1 g1.1 g
Sugar0 g0.3 g
Nutrient density13 /1007 /100
Weight-loss score36 /10038 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork · Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers, from kid's menu

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork, Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →