🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken vs Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers has more protein (18.7 vs 12.9 g); Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken has less calories (295 vs 307 kcal); Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers has more fiber (1.1 vs 0.9 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chickenRestaurant, family style, chicken fingers
Calories295 kcal307 kcal
Protein12.9 g18.7 g
Carbs24 g18.8 g
Fat16.4 g17.5 g
Fiber0.9 g1.1 g
Sugar11.6 g0.3 g
Nutrient density8 /1007 /100
Weight-loss score24 /10038 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken · Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers, from kid's menu

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken, Restaurant, family style, chicken fingers and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →