🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken vs Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken has more protein (12.9 vs 8.9 g); Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has less calories (260 vs 295 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has more fiber (1 vs 0.9 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chickenRestaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
Calories295 kcal260 kcal
Protein12.9 g8.9 g
Carbs24 g25.5 g
Fat16.4 g13.6 g
Fiber0.9 g1 g
Sugar11.6 g0 g
Nutrient density8 /10013 /100
Weight-loss score24 /10036 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken · Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken, Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →