🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice vs Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta has more protein (16.2 vs 4.1 g); Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice has less calories (174 vs 204 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice has more fiber (1.1 vs 0.9 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, fried riceRestaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta
Calories174 kcal204 kcal
Protein4.1 g16.2 g
Carbs32.8 g10.9 g
Fat3 g10.6 g
Fiber1.1 g0.9 g
Sugar0.6 g2.8 g
Nutrient density5 /10020 /100
Weight-loss score41 /10050 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat · Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →