🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice vs Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has more protein (8.9 vs 4.1 g); Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice has less calories (174 vs 260 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice has more fiber (1.1 vs 1 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, fried riceRestaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
Calories174 kcal260 kcal
Protein4.1 g8.9 g
Carbs32.8 g25.5 g
Fat3 g13.6 g
Fiber1.1 g1 g
Sugar0.6 g0 g
Nutrient density5 /10013 /100
Weight-loss score41 /10036 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat · Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →