🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) vs Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) has more protein (22.5 vs 18.5 g); Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has less calories (209 vs 276 kcal).
Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)
Calories209 kcal276 kcal
Protein18.5 g22.5 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat14.4 g20 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density12 /1009 /100
Weight-loss score51 /10043 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw · Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →