🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) vs Lamb, loin, separable lean and fat

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has more protein (26.2 vs 26.1 g); Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has less calories (242 vs 297 kcal).
Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)Lamb, loin, separable lean and fat
Calories242 kcal297 kcal
Protein26.2 g26.1 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat14.4 g20.6 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density18 /10010 /100
Weight-loss score51 /10042 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted · Lamb, loin, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, broiled

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), Lamb, loin, separable lean and fat and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →