🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) vs Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) has more protein (32.8 vs 25.6 g); Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has less calories (258 vs 283 kcal).
Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)
Calories258 kcal283 kcal
Protein25.6 g32.8 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat16.5 g15.9 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density15 /10022 /100
Weight-loss score49 /10047 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted · Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade), separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, braised

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →