🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, leg, shank half vs Lamb, loin, separable lean and fat

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, leg, shank half has more protein (26.7 vs 23.3 g); Lamb, leg, shank half has less calories (217 vs 290 kcal).
Lamb, leg, shank halfLamb, loin, separable lean and fat
Calories217 kcal290 kcal
Protein26.7 g23.3 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat11.4 g21.1 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density24 /1008 /100
Weight-loss score53 /10041 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, leg, shank half, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted · Lamb, loin, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, leg, shank half, Lamb, loin, separable lean and fat and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →