🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, leg, shank half vs Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, leg, shank half has more protein (26.7 vs 25.6 g); Lamb, leg, shank half has less calories (217 vs 258 kcal).
Lamb, leg, shank halfLamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)
Calories217 kcal258 kcal
Protein26.7 g25.6 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat11.4 g16.5 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density24 /10015 /100
Weight-loss score53 /10049 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, leg, shank half, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted · Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, leg, shank half, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →