🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, ground, raw vs Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has more protein (25.6 vs 16.6 g); Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has less calories (258 vs 282 kcal).
Lamb, ground, rawLamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)
Calories282 kcal258 kcal
Protein16.6 g25.6 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat23.4 g16.5 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density0 /10015 /100
Weight-loss score36 /10049 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, ground, raw · Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, ground, raw, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →