🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, ground, cooked vs Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, ground, cooked has more protein (24.8 vs 18.5 g); Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has less calories (209 vs 283 kcal).
Lamb, ground, cookedLamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)
Calories283 kcal209 kcal
Protein24.8 g18.5 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat19.7 g14.4 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density11 /10012 /100
Weight-loss score44 /10051 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, ground, cooked, broiled · Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, ground, cooked, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →