🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat vs Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat has more protein (28.2 vs 25.6 g); Lamb, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat has less calories (206 vs 258 kcal).
Lamb, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fatLamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)
Calories206 kcal258 kcal
Protein28.2 g25.6 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat9.5 g16.5 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density31 /10015 /100
Weight-loss score54 /10049 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked · Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →