🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat vs Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) has more protein (24.4 vs 16.9 g); Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat has less calories (267 vs 278 kcal).
Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fatLamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)
Calories267 kcal278 kcal
Protein16.9 g24.4 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat21.6 g19.3 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density2 /10011 /100
Weight-loss score39 /10044 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw · Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, broiled

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →