🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, Australian, imported vs Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, Australian, imported has more protein (25.2 vs 19.6 g); Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) has less calories (144 vs 244 kcal).
Lamb, Australian, importedLamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)
Calories244 kcal144 kcal
Protein25.2 g19.6 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat15.1 g6.8 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density15 /10033 /100
Weight-loss score51 /10061 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, cooked, roasted · Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade), separable lean only, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, Australian, imported, Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →