🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, Australian, imported vs Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, Australian, imported has more protein (24.9 vs 18.5 g); Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has less calories (209 vs 281 kcal).
Lamb, Australian, importedLamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)
Calories281 kcal209 kcal
Protein24.9 g18.5 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat19.4 g14.4 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density9 /10012 /100
Weight-loss score44 /10051 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, leg, sirloin half, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, cooked, roasted · Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, Australian, imported, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →