🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Bison, ground, grass-fed vs Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Bison, ground, grass-fed has more protein (25.5 vs 17.9 g); Bison, ground, grass-fed has less calories (179 vs 230 kcal).
Bison, ground, grass-fedLamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)
Calories179 kcal230 kcal
Protein25.5 g17.9 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat8.6 g17.1 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density35 /1008 /100
Weight-loss score57 /10046 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked · Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, raw

← More food comparisons

Track Bison, ground, grass-fed, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →