🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Bison, ground, grass-fed vs Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has more protein (25.6 vs 25.5 g); Bison, ground, grass-fed has less calories (179 vs 258 kcal).
Bison, ground, grass-fedLamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)
Calories179 kcal258 kcal
Protein25.5 g25.6 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat8.6 g16.5 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density35 /10015 /100
Weight-loss score57 /10049 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked · Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Bison, ground, grass-fed, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →