🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Bison, ground, grass-fed vs Lamb, leg, shank half

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, leg, shank half has more protein (26.7 vs 25.5 g); Bison, ground, grass-fed has less calories (179 vs 217 kcal).
Bison, ground, grass-fedLamb, leg, shank half
Calories179 kcal217 kcal
Protein25.5 g26.7 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat8.6 g11.4 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density35 /10024 /100
Weight-loss score57 /10053 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Bison, ground, grass-fed, cooked · Lamb, leg, shank half, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Bison, ground, grass-fed, Lamb, leg, shank half and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →