🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON vs Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are baby foods.

Per 100 g, Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW has more protein (12.9 vs 1.8 g); Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON has less calories (64 vs 505 kcal); Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON has less sugar (7.2 vs 33 g).
Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSONToddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW
Calories64 kcal505 kcal
Protein1.8 g12.9 g
Carbs7.2 g52.8 g
Fat3.6 g26.9 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar7.2 g33 g
Nutrient density58 /10049 /100
Weight-loss score44 /1000 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW PREMIUM (formerly ENFAMIL, LIPIL, NEXT STEP), ready-to-feed · Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW, Toddler Transitions, with ARA and DHA, powder

← More food comparisons

Track Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →