🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Restaurant, Mexican, spanish rice

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has more protein (8.9 vs 3.3 g); Restaurant, Mexican, spanish rice has less calories (185 vs 260 kcal); Restaurant, Mexican, spanish rice has more fiber (1.2 vs 1 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour porkRestaurant, Mexican, spanish rice
Calories260 kcal185 kcal
Protein8.9 g3.3 g
Carbs25.5 g31.2 g
Fat13.6 g5.3 g
Fiber1 g1.2 g
Sugar0 g1.3 g
Nutrient density13 /1001 /100
Weight-loss score36 /10038 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork · Restaurant, Mexican, spanish rice

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork, Restaurant, Mexican, spanish rice and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →