🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Restaurant, family style, hash browns

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has more protein (8.9 vs 2.5 g); Restaurant, family style, hash browns has less calories (197 vs 260 kcal); Restaurant, family style, hash browns has more fiber (2.7 vs 1 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour porkRestaurant, family style, hash browns
Calories260 kcal197 kcal
Protein8.9 g2.5 g
Carbs25.5 g26.6 g
Fat13.6 g9 g
Fiber1 g2.7 g
Sugar0 g1.4 g
Nutrient density13 /1005 /100
Weight-loss score36 /10040 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork · Restaurant, family style, hash browns

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork, Restaurant, family style, hash browns and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →