🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork vs Restaurant, family style, chicken tenders

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, family style, chicken tenders has more protein (18.9 vs 8.9 g); Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has less calories (260 vs 302 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has more fiber (1 vs 0.9 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour porkRestaurant, family style, chicken tenders
Calories260 kcal302 kcal
Protein8.9 g18.9 g
Carbs25.5 g19.3 g
Fat13.6 g16.6 g
Fiber1 g0.9 g
Sugar0 g0.2 g
Nutrient density13 /1007 /100
Weight-loss score36 /10038 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork · Restaurant, family style, chicken tenders

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork, Restaurant, family style, chicken tenders and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →