🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken vs Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta has more protein (16.2 vs 9.8 g); Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has less calories (129 vs 204 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has more fiber (1.5 vs 0.9 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chickenRestaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta
Calories129 kcal204 kcal
Protein9.8 g16.2 g
Carbs6.9 g10.9 g
Fat7 g10.6 g
Fiber1.5 g0.9 g
Sugar3 g2.8 g
Nutrient density30 /10020 /100
Weight-loss score58 /10050 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken · Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken, Restaurant, Italian, chicken parmesan without pasta and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →