🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken vs Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken has more protein (12.9 vs 9.8 g); Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has less calories (129 vs 295 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has more fiber (1.5 vs 0.9 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chickenRestaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken
Calories295 kcal129 kcal
Protein12.9 g9.8 g
Carbs24 g6.9 g
Fat16.4 g7 g
Fiber0.9 g1.5 g
Sugar11.6 g3 g
Nutrient density8 /10030 /100
Weight-loss score24 /10058 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken · Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, general tso's chicken, Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →