🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice vs Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has more protein (9.8 vs 4.1 g); Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has less calories (129 vs 174 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has more fiber (1.5 vs 1.1 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, fried riceRestaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken
Calories174 kcal129 kcal
Protein4.1 g9.8 g
Carbs32.8 g6.9 g
Fat3 g7 g
Fiber1.1 g1.5 g
Sugar0.6 g3 g
Nutrient density5 /10030 /100
Weight-loss score41 /10058 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, without meat · Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, fried rice, Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →