🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables vs Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has more protein (8.9 vs 8.2 g); Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables has less calories (95 vs 260 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has more fiber (1 vs 0.9 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetablesRestaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
Calories95 kcal260 kcal
Protein8.2 g8.9 g
Carbs5.4 g25.5 g
Fat4.6 g13.6 g
Fiber0.9 g1 g
Sugar2.9 g0 g
Nutrient density32 /10013 /100
Weight-loss score62 /10036 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables · Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, chicken and vegetables, Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →