🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables vs Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork has more protein (8.9 vs 7.1 g); Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has less calories (105 vs 260 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables has more fiber (1.5 vs 1 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetablesRestaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork
Calories105 kcal260 kcal
Protein7.1 g8.9 g
Carbs7.3 g25.5 g
Fat5.3 g13.6 g
Fiber1.5 g1 g
Sugar2.4 g0 g
Nutrient density36 /10013 /100
Weight-loss score59 /10036 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables · Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, beef and vegetables, Restaurant, Chinese, sweet and sour pork and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →