🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Pork, cured, ham -- water added vs Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are pork products.

Per 100 g, Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg has more protein (18.2 vs 18 g); Pork, cured, ham -- water added has less calories (117 vs 211 kcal); Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg has less sugar (0 vs 1.6 g).
Pork, cured, ham -- water addedPork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg
Calories117 kcal211 kcal
Protein18 g18.2 g
Carbs1.6 g0 g
Fat4.4 g14.8 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar1.6 g0 g
Nutrient density0 /10013 /100
Weight-loss score62 /10050 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Pork, cured, ham -- water added, whole, boneless, separable lean only, heated, roasted · Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg, loin, shoulder, and spareribs, (includes cuts to be cured), separable lean and fat, raw

← More food comparisons

Track Pork, cured, ham -- water added, Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →