🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Pork, cured, ham and water product vs Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are pork products.

Per 100 g, Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg has more protein (18.2 vs 18.2 g); Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg has less calories (211 vs 234 kcal); Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg has less sugar (0 vs 1 g).
Pork, cured, ham and water productPork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg
Calories234 kcal211 kcal
Protein18.2 g18.2 g
Carbs1.4 g0 g
Fat17.3 g14.8 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar1 g0 g
Nutrient density0 /10013 /100
Weight-loss score45 /10050 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Pork, cured, ham and water product, shank, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted · Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg, loin, shoulder, and spareribs, (includes cuts to be cured), separable lean and fat, raw

← More food comparisons

Track Pork, cured, ham and water product, Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →