🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Pork, cured, ham and water product vs Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are pork products.

Per 100 g, Pork, cured, ham and water product has more protein (19.5 vs 18.2 g); Pork, cured, ham and water product has less calories (186 vs 211 kcal); Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg has less sugar (0 vs 1 g).
Pork, cured, ham and water productPork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg
Calories186 kcal211 kcal
Protein19.5 g18.2 g
Carbs1.2 g0 g
Fat11.5 g14.8 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar1 g0 g
Nutrient density0 /10013 /100
Weight-loss score55 /10050 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Pork, cured, ham and water product, rump, bone-in, separable lean and fat, heated, roasted · Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg, loin, shoulder, and spareribs, (includes cuts to be cured), separable lean and fat, raw

← More food comparisons

Track Pork, cured, ham and water product, Pork, fresh, composite of trimmed leg and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →