🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat vs Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has more protein (26.2 vs 24.5 g); Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) has less calories (242 vs 294 kcal).
Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fatLamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin)
Calories294 kcal242 kcal
Protein24.5 g26.2 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat20.9 g14.4 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density9 /10018 /100
Weight-loss score41 /10051 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked · Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, Lamb, leg, whole (shank and sirloin) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →