🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat vs Lamb, leg, shank half

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, leg, shank half has more protein (26.7 vs 24.5 g); Lamb, leg, shank half has less calories (217 vs 294 kcal).
Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fatLamb, leg, shank half
Calories294 kcal217 kcal
Protein24.5 g26.7 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat20.9 g11.4 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density9 /10024 /100
Weight-loss score41 /10053 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, choice, cooked · Lamb, leg, shank half, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/4" fat, Lamb, leg, shank half and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →