🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Lamb, Australian, imported vs Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are lamb, veal, and game products.

Per 100 g, Lamb, Australian, imported has more protein (24.9 vs 22.7 g); Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) has less calories (269 vs 281 kcal).
Lamb, Australian, importedLamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade)
Calories281 kcal269 kcal
Protein24.9 g22.7 g
Carbs0 g0 g
Fat19.4 g19.1 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar0 g0 g
Nutrient density9 /10010 /100
Weight-loss score44 /10044 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Lamb, Australian, imported, fresh, leg, sirloin half, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, cooked, roasted · Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade), separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, cooked, roasted

← More food comparisons

Track Lamb, Australian, imported, Lamb, shoulder, whole (arm and blade) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →