🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24 vs Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are baby foods.

Per 100 g, Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW has more protein (12.9 vs 1.6 g); Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24 has less calories (71 vs 505 kcal); Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24 has less sugar (8.1 vs 33 g).
Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW
Calories71 kcal505 kcal
Protein1.6 g12.9 g
Carbs6.9 g52.8 g
Fat4.1 g26.9 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar8.1 g33 g
Nutrient density46 /10049 /100
Weight-loss score41 /1000 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA · Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW, Toddler Transitions, with ARA and DHA, powder

← More food comparisons

Track Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →