🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCE vs Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are baby foods.

Per 100 g, Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCE has more protein (14 vs 12.9 g); Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW has less calories (505 vs 517 kcal); Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW has less sugar (33 vs 34.2 g).
Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCEToddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW
Calories517 kcal505 kcal
Protein14 g12.9 g
Carbs51.9 g52.8 g
Fat28.2 g26.9 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar34.2 g33 g
Nutrient density45 /10049 /100
Weight-loss score0 /1000 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCE, with iron, powder, not reconstituted, with DHA and ARA · Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW, Toddler Transitions, with ARA and DHA, powder

← More food comparisons

Track Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCE, Toddler formula, MEAD JOHNSON, ENFAGROW and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →