🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken vs Restaurant, family style, chicken tenders

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are restaurant foods.

Per 100 g, Restaurant, family style, chicken tenders has more protein (18.9 vs 9.8 g); Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has less calories (129 vs 302 kcal); Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken has more fiber (1.5 vs 0.9 g).
Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chickenRestaurant, family style, chicken tenders
Calories129 kcal302 kcal
Protein9.8 g18.9 g
Carbs6.9 g19.3 g
Fat7 g16.6 g
Fiber1.5 g0.9 g
Sugar3 g0.2 g
Nutrient density30 /1007 /100
Weight-loss score58 /10038 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken · Restaurant, family style, chicken tenders

← More food comparisons

Track Restaurant, Chinese, kung pao chicken, Restaurant, family style, chicken tenders and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →