🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCE vs Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are baby foods.

Per 100 g, Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCE has more protein (14 vs 1.6 g); Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24 has less calories (71 vs 517 kcal); Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24 has less sugar (8.1 vs 34.2 g).
Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCEInfant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24
Calories517 kcal71 kcal
Protein14 g1.6 g
Carbs51.9 g6.9 g
Fat28.2 g4.1 g
Fiber0 g0 g
Sugar34.2 g8.1 g
Nutrient density45 /10046 /100
Weight-loss score0 /10041 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCE, with iron, powder, not reconstituted, with DHA and ARA · Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24, ready to feed, with ARA and DHA

← More food comparisons

Track Infant formula, ABBOTT NUTRITION, ALIMENTUM ADVANCE, Infant formula, MEAD JOHNSON, Enfamil 24 and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →