🍽️ FittestMe.aiFoodsNutrients

Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) vs Oscar Mayer, Wieners (beef franks)

Nutrition compared per 100 g, from USDA data. Both are sausages and luncheon meats.

Per 100 g, Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) has more protein (16.6 vs 11.4 g); Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) has less calories (164 vs 329 kcal); Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) has more fiber (1.3 vs 0 g).
Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat)Oscar Mayer, Wieners (beef franks)
Calories164 kcal329 kcal
Protein16.6 g11.4 g
Carbs3.6 g2.8 g
Fat8.8 g30.3 g
Fiber1.3 g0 g
Sugar1 g1.6 g
Nutrient density15 /1000 /100
Weight-loss score62 /10024 /100

Per 100 g. Nutrient density = NRF9.3; weight-loss score = satiety-per-calorie composite. Green = the more favourable value.

Full details: Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat) · Oscar Mayer, Wieners (beef franks)

← More food comparisons

Track Ham, sliced, regular (approximately 11% fat), Oscar Mayer, Wieners (beef franks) and 50,000+ foods with a photo. Get FittestMe.ai on the App Store →